Sitemaps
Assume Everyone Will Leave in Year One
Stop Listening to Investors
Was Mortgaging My Life Worth it?
What's My Startup Worth in an Acquisition?
When Our Ambition is Our Enemy
Are Startups in a "Silent Recession"?
The 5 Types of Startup Funding
What Is Startup Funding?
Do Founders Deserve Their Profit?
Michelle Glauser on Diversity and Inclusion
The Utter STUPIDITY of "Risking it All"
Committees Are Where Progress Goes to Die
More Money (Really Means) More Problems
Why Most Founders Don't Get Rich
Investors will be Obsolete
Why is a Founder so Hard to Replace?
We Can't Grow by Saying "No"
Do People Really Want Me to Succeed?
Is the Problem the Player or the Coach?
Will Investors Bail Me Out?
The Value of Actually Getting Paid
Why do Founders Suck at Asking for Help?
Wait a Minute before Giving Away Equity
You Only Think You Work Hard
SMALL is the New Big — Embracing Efficiency in the Age of AI
The 9 Best Growth Agencies for Startups
This is BOOTSTRAPPED — 3 Strategies to Build Your Startup Without Funding
Never Share Your Net Worth
A Steady Hand in the Middle of the Storm
Risk it All vs Steady Paycheck
How About a Startup that Just Makes Money?
How to Recruit a Rockstar Advisor
Why Having Zero Experience is a Huge Asset
My Competitor Got Funded — Am I Screwed?
The Hidden Treasure of Failed Startups
If It Makes Money, It Makes Sense
Why do VCs Keep Giving Failed Founders Money?
$10K Per Month isn't Just Revenue — It's Life Support
The Ridiculous Spectrum of Investor Feedback
Startup CEOs Aren't Really CEOs
Series A, B, C, D, and E Funding: How It Works
Best Pitch Decks Ever: The Most Successful Fundraising Pitches You Need to Know
When to Raise Funds
Why Aren't Investors Responding to Me?
Should I Regret Not Raising Capital?
Unemployment Cases — Why I LOOOOOVE To Win Them So Much.
How Much to Pay Yourself
Heat-Seeking Missile: WePay’s Journey to Product-Market Fit — Interview with Rich Aberman, Co-Founder of Wepay
The R&D technique for startups: Rip off & Duplicate
Why Some Startups Win.
Chapter #1: First Steps To Validate Your Business Idea
Product Users, Not Ideas, Will Determine Your Startup’s Fate
Drop Your Free Tier
Your Advisors Are Probably Wrong
Growth Isn't Always Good
How to Shut Down Gracefully
How Does My Startup Get Acquired?
Can Entrepreneurship Be Taught?
How to Pick the Wrong Co-Founder
Staying Small While Going Big
Investors are NOT on Our Side of the Table
Who am I Really Competing Against?
Why Can't Founders Replace Themselves?
Actually, We Have Plenty of Time
Quitting vs Letting Go
How Startups Actually Get Bought
What if I'm Building the Wrong Product?
Are Founders Driven by Fear or Greed?
Why I'm Either Working or Feeling Guilty
Startup Financial Assumptions
Why Every Kid Should be a Startup Founder
We Only Have to be Right Once
If a Startup Sinks, Founders Go Down With it
Founder Success: We Need a Strict Definition of Personal Success
Is Quiet Quitting a Problem at Startup Companies?
Founder Exits are Hard Work and Good Fortune, Not "Good Luck"
Finalizing Startup Projections
All Founders are Beloved In Good Times
Our Startup Culture of Entitlement
The Bullshit Case for Raising Capital
How do We Manage Our Founder Flaws?
What If my plan for retirement is "never retire"?
Startup Failure is just One Chapter in Founder Life
6 Similarities between Startup Founders and Pro Athletes
All Founders Make Bad Decisions — and That's OK
Startup Board Negotiations: How do I tell the board I need a new deal?
Founder Sacrifice — At What Point Have I Gone Too Far?
Youth Entrepreneurship: Can Middle Schoolers be Founders?
Living the Founder Legend Isn't so Fun
Why Do VC Funded Startups Love "Fake Growth?"
How Should I Share My Wealth with Family?
How Many Deaths Can a Startup Survive?
This is Probably Your Last Success
Why Do We Still Have Full-Time Employees?
The Case Against Full Transparency
Should I Feel Guilty for Failing?
Always Take Money off the Table
Founder Impostor Syndrome Never Goes Away
When is Founder Ego Too Much?
The Invention of the 20-Something-Year-Old Founder

Startup Stock Vesting

The Startups Team

Startup Stock Vesting

Welcome to Phase Two of a four-part Splitting Equity Series. If you missed it, start your journey here: Introduction - Early Startup Equity — Getting it Right before continuing on if you haven’t already, and go in order from there.

Phase One - Startup Equity - Avoiding Early Mistakes 

Phase Two - Part 1 - How Startup Equity Works 

Phase Three - How to Split Equity

Phase Four - Equity Management

Let's continue!

Vesting is a way to allow members to "earn" their stock over some period of time or per specific milestones. A common "4-year vesting schedule" means that a member of the company will earn 25% of their stock or stock options per year over a total of 4 years (the vesting period). 

A typical vesting schedule means an employee won't get their full stock until they are "fully vested" at the end of 4 years (or whatever their own vesting schedule is set at). This creates some incentive for employee ownership to be aligned with a longer-term contribution.

Employees get restricted stock or restricted stock units as they become fully vested over time.

Stock Vesting for Not Dummies

Think of it like this — if I'm your co-founder, there are only two ways we can divide our full ownership. First, we can divide it all upfront and be done with it. That's how most startups do it because it's simple, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea. 

That said, everyone in the 1970s let their little kids ride in the front seat of the station wagon with no seat belt, but that didn't make it a good idea!

Or, because we took the time to seek out a course on how to split equity properly, we can learn why smart co-founders (and the investors who back them) prefer to set up a vesting schedule to earn their stock over time!

You're the Vest... Around (meh mah meh meh meh mah meh mah meh)

(If you read that and knew it was a Karate Kid reference, you’re cool in my book).  

Vesting schedules are commonly used among funded startups as employer contributions to employees who earn their stock (or stock options) over time. As opposed to immediate vesting where all the stock is granted up front, this provides an incentive to stick around.

It also provides a mechanism to be sure that if folks bail (or get fired) that a huge swath of equity wasn't arbitrarily awarded without earning it.

Founders Vesting their own Equity?

So why would the two of us wily co-founders want to vest our own equity?  

Simple — to make sure we both do what we think we're going to do over the long haul. Without vesting, we run into the problem of having distributed equity without being sure our own contributions have been truly earned. That goes for Founders as well as employees.

If everyone is doing what they said they were going to do - vesting shouldn't be a problem and it should go unnoticed. However, if problems arise (a founder leaves, for example) then vesting becomes really important because we haven't given away all of the stock without a mechanism to return it fairly.

We want to tie employee compensation to a fair grant date and fair market value when shares vest.

3 Vesting Schedule Decisions

Assuming we understand the value of vesting, we have 3 big decisions to make to determine how vesting will work. We've got some smaller details like "exercise price" that are also important but for now, let's focus on the "Big 3."

Vesting Schedule 

The time period that determines how long our equity will take to be earned. Most startups define vesting schedules to be 3 or 4 years.

Vesting Cliff

A determined period of time (typically the first year, so a "one-year cliff") where equity cannot be granted. This allows us to make sure someone puts in at least a year before we start awarding stock, or we push them off a cliff — metaphorically speaking of course! Typically if an employee leaves within the first year they will not be awarded stock.

Vesting Acceleration

Events that would cause the unvested shares to automatically vest based on a specific milestone (often an acquisition of the company). These vesting terms are often overlooked but incredibly important down the road.

Those 3 decisions will be most of our vesting work and will set the framework for who the company shares are doled out over time. We want an employee compensation package that's fair, but we also want a potential solution that doesn't put our startup in a bad spot.

Accelerating stock options can create a taxable event on a specific date to force an employee to pay tax on stock.

Vesting Schedule

Vesting works on what's called a "vesting schedule" which simply means the amount of time until all of our stock is earned. These are usually represented in a single-year period (1, 2, 3, 4 years).

In the example we used earlier, if we have a "four-year vesting period" of our equity, that means at the end of year 1 we will own 25% of our total 100% stake. At the end of Year 2, we will own a total of 50%, and so on. We have to stick it out for 4 years to earn 100% of our stake using a time-based schedule.

The two most common types of vesting schedules are "time-based" and "milestone-based."

Time-Based 

Equity is earned over a fixed period of time (typical is a three or four-year vesting schedule) with a specific percentage vested at each date. This is the route most startups go.

The decision is largely based on how long we think someone should contribute in order to earn their full stock. The three or four-year vesting schedule plans are where most startups land because it implies someone has made a significant contribution.

Key Decision:

Pick a time period in which vesting will fully occur. 4 years is standard, but we can choose any period of time.

Milestone Based Vesting

In Milestone Based Vesting equity or stock options are earned based on the member achieving certain milestones. For a salesperson, for example, the milestone could be a certain sales target. For a software engineer, it could be a specific release date of the company's product.

There are no hard and fast rules on how long a vest should occur or what milestones we can choose. Just like negotiating compensation, we want to find a balance between being fair and “well-earned.” If we think that 2 years is enough time for the Founders to have earned our stock, so be it.

Key Decision:

Pick certain milestones that we think are critical to the growth of the business and apply a market based value to that contribution that can be translated into full vested stock.

Vesting Cliff

Cliff vesting is a form of time-based vesting where employees receive shares only if they have stayed on board for a certain period of time (typically one year).

Imagine what would happen if startup founders were awarding vested shares to every new employee regardless of whether or not they only worked a few months. Our cap table would be loaded with owners who were never really around long enough to contribute.

Since startups don't offer the same retirement benefits (because retirement age is a way off!) we have stock options.

A "Vesting Cliff" Awards Contributors

To combat this, we can set up a “vesting cliff” that stipulates a minimum time period someone has to be vested before any of their stock can be granted. This is often a one-year cliff, but we can set it to be any threshold we want. 

Most startups use a year because that seems like a reasonable amount of time that would yield a reward for anyone. If an employee stays only 11 months, for example, they wouldn’t be eligible for any stock in a cliff vesting scenario.

Vesting Cliffs are optional but generally a good idea so that we don’t accumulate a ton of short-term employee stock grants. The likelihood that these employees made a significant contribution to earn their stock in less than a year is probably low — but that's a decision for the co-founders to make.

A Caveat to Cliff Vesting

We may offer company stock options to some contractors or non-employees (like a law firm or those providing professional advice) that specifically don’t entail a long-term commitment, and therefore in those cases, we’ll just waive the one-year cliff provision. 

For example, if we contracted a designer for our Web site and decided to pay them a one-time grant of $25,000 for their work, we would likely grant them the company stock all at once since there is no time-based employment condition. This would revert in most cases to a “milestone-based” award whereby they delivered the project in order to get awarded stock units.

A typical one-year cliff will mean that no stock is awarded up until the first milestone of 1 year. At that time, assuming it’s a 4-year vest at 25% per year, the member would earn 25% at the end of Year 1. They just wouldn’t earn any stock if they didn’t make it past Year 1.

Key Decision:

Pick a “cliff” period during which no stock will vest until this period is reached. 

Vesting Acceleration

The last piece of the puzzle is called “Vesting Acceleration” which covers events like “What happens to everyone’s vesting of stock if the company sells tomorrow (before everyone is fully vested)?” For this reason, we’ll add something called “Vesting Acceleration” which often involves a “trigger event” (such as a sale).  

If the company sells we'll want to make sure our shares vest immediately so we get our full value at a set price.

Acceleration is the goal, but the “trigger” is what we need to determine.  

In most cases, if a sale occurs (this would be a “trigger”) then everyone’s stock will fully vest or “accelerate” just as if they had waited their 4 years or met their total milestone goals.  Our intent with accelerated vesting is to make sure that members feel they are treated fairly in the event of something wonderful happening.  

Should Everyone get Fully Vested?

In reality, is it “fair” that someone who worked there 6 years will have vested as much as someone who worked there for 2 years and happened to be there during the sale? Not exactly, but if we feel strongly about that we can modify the acceleration to only accelerate one year of vesting.  It doesn’t have to be all or nothing.

Moving from partial ownership to full ownership is a big decision.

Vesting schedules are tricky things when it comes to stock options because it's always going to be hard to determine who really "earned" their stock and who was just in the right place at the right time. We can monkey with cliff vesting, accelerate immediate vesting, or drag out time-based vesting but the reality is we're not going to create a one size fits all program.

Key Decision:

Pick particular triggers that would accelerate vesting and determine how much of the vesting will be accelerated.  

Three Stock Decisions

Our special considerations for stock options will come down to a few important decisions.  We’ll first determine whether we want to include each provision (vesting schedule, cliff, and acceleration) and then exactly how we want to modify it for our needs.

Decision #1: Vesting Schedule

If we choose to have the stock vest — is it based on a time-based vesting or milestone-based vesting?

Time Period

  • Will the stock vest monthly (incrementally) or each year (annually?)

  • How many years will the stock vest over? (3 - 4 is common)

Milestone

  • What milestones will need to be met in order for the stock to vest?

  • What percentage of the stock will vest at each milestone?

Decision #2: Vesting Cliff

Do we want to invoke a period in which the stock can’t be awarded? A typical window is 1 year for a vesting cliff.

Decision #3: Vesting Acceleration 

Would we like stockholders' equity to be automatically vested based on a triggering event such as a sale?

  • What happens in the event of a sale? Does everyone's stock options immediately convert to common stock?

  • What other milestones may accelerate employee stock?

What Happens Next?

Once we make these decisions, we will then take these decisions to our attorneys as the basis for how we would like our agreements to be set up. These will be the 3 most important moving parts that our legal team will need to craft our team agreements.

Don't worry too much about getting this "wrong" because we can modify the agreements in the first year or so as we learn more about what makes sense for each co-founder as well as the team as a whole. Chances are we just need a little time to get some feedback.

David Rogers

A clear understanding of the topic is absolutely essential, because without direction you cannot expect to be effective. Understanding the diversity of the topic cannot be achieved immediately, so do not rush into writing. Once the topic is better understood, this will allow you to outline the aspects that need to be discussed. When this practice is completed before the paper is written, then the writer will be able to write with enough confidence. Writers from any https://studyessay.org/coursework-help/ site follow this strategy because it helps them to make a list of the aspects that need to be emphasized.

Reply2 years ago

Upgrade to join the discussion.

Already a member? Login

Upgrade to Unlock