Sitemaps
Assume Everyone Will Leave in Year One
Stop Listening to Investors
Was Mortgaging My Life Worth it?
What's My Startup Worth in an Acquisition?
When Our Ambition is Our Enemy
Are Startups in a "Silent Recession"?
The 5 Types of Startup Funding
What Is Startup Funding?
Do Founders Deserve Their Profit?
Michelle Glauser on Diversity and Inclusion
The Utter STUPIDITY of "Risking it All"
Committees Are Where Progress Goes to Die
More Money (Really Means) More Problems
Why Most Founders Don't Get Rich
Investors will be Obsolete
Why is a Founder so Hard to Replace?
We Can't Grow by Saying "No"
Do People Really Want Me to Succeed?
Is the Problem the Player or the Coach?
Will Investors Bail Me Out?
The Value of Actually Getting Paid
Why do Founders Suck at Asking for Help?
Wait a Minute before Giving Away Equity
You Only Think You Work Hard
SMALL is the New Big — Embracing Efficiency in the Age of AI
The 9 Best Growth Agencies for Startups
This is BOOTSTRAPPED — 3 Strategies to Build Your Startup Without Funding
Never Share Your Net Worth
A Steady Hand in the Middle of the Storm
Risk it All vs Steady Paycheck
How About a Startup that Just Makes Money?
How to Recruit a Rockstar Advisor
Why Having Zero Experience is a Huge Asset
My Competitor Got Funded — Am I Screwed?
The Hidden Treasure of Failed Startups
If It Makes Money, It Makes Sense
Why do VCs Keep Giving Failed Founders Money?
$10K Per Month isn't Just Revenue — It's Life Support
The Ridiculous Spectrum of Investor Feedback
Startup CEOs Aren't Really CEOs
Series A, B, C, D, and E Funding: How It Works
Best Pitch Decks Ever: The Most Successful Fundraising Pitches You Need to Know
When to Raise Funds
Why Aren't Investors Responding to Me?
Should I Regret Not Raising Capital?
Unemployment Cases — Why I LOOOOOVE To Win Them So Much.
How Much to Pay Yourself
Heat-Seeking Missile: WePay’s Journey to Product-Market Fit — Interview with Rich Aberman, Co-Founder of Wepay
The R&D technique for startups: Rip off & Duplicate
Why Some Startups Win.
Chapter #1: First Steps To Validate Your Business Idea
Product Users, Not Ideas, Will Determine Your Startup’s Fate
Drop Your Free Tier
Your Advisors Are Probably Wrong
Growth Isn't Always Good
How to Shut Down Gracefully
How Does My Startup Get Acquired?
Can Entrepreneurship Be Taught?
How to Pick the Wrong Co-Founder
Staying Small While Going Big
Investors are NOT on Our Side of the Table
Who am I Really Competing Against?
Why Can't Founders Replace Themselves?
Actually, We Have Plenty of Time
Quitting vs Letting Go
How Startups Actually Get Bought
What if I'm Building the Wrong Product?
Are Founders Driven by Fear or Greed?
Why I'm Either Working or Feeling Guilty
Startup Financial Assumptions
Why Every Kid Should be a Startup Founder
We Only Have to be Right Once
If a Startup Sinks, Founders Go Down With it
Founder Success: We Need a Strict Definition of Personal Success
Is Quiet Quitting a Problem at Startup Companies?
Founder Exits are Hard Work and Good Fortune, Not "Good Luck"
Finalizing Startup Projections
All Founders are Beloved In Good Times
Our Startup Culture of Entitlement
The Bullshit Case for Raising Capital
How do We Manage Our Founder Flaws?
What If my plan for retirement is "never retire"?
Startup Failure is just One Chapter in Founder Life
6 Similarities between Startup Founders and Pro Athletes
All Founders Make Bad Decisions — and That's OK
Startup Board Negotiations: How do I tell the board I need a new deal?
Founder Sacrifice — At What Point Have I Gone Too Far?
Youth Entrepreneurship: Can Middle Schoolers be Founders?
Living the Founder Legend Isn't so Fun
Why Do VC Funded Startups Love "Fake Growth?"
How Should I Share My Wealth with Family?
How Many Deaths Can a Startup Survive?
This is Probably Your Last Success
Why Do We Still Have Full-Time Employees?
The Case Against Full Transparency
Should I Feel Guilty for Failing?
Always Take Money off the Table
Founder Impostor Syndrome Never Goes Away
When is Founder Ego Too Much?
The Invention of the 20-Something-Year-Old Founder

Founder Compensation: The Good, the Bad, and the Suicidal

Marcello Miranda

Founder Compensation: The Good, the Bad, and the Suicidal

the startup founders pay is a tricky topic, especially if the startup needs to raise money

Founders can make or break startups. That's no secret. The founding team is the cornerstone of any new venture, and their ethics, motivations, and philosophies tend to become firmly ingrained into their company's culture and strategy. Like a fractal, a startup is an aggregate mirror of its founders' priorities, whether that be Airbnb's obsession with design or Theranos' obsession with fraud.

All the more reason for good founders to be properly compensated, with a founder salary that includes incentives that align their goals with those of their investors and employees.

Unfortunately, it's harder than it sounds. Every startup is different, and every founder has a different relationship with every investor, so there is no real one-size-fits-all approach. There are good startup founder compensation policies, but also bad policies, and some policies that outright kill a startup.

Read on.

In your own business and your own company, founder pay means paying yourself

The Good

Startup founders cashing out upon a liquidity event (M&A or IPO).

There is a reason why this is the standard, classic path for Founder equity compensation. It perfectly aligns the incentives of founders with those of VC investors and their LPs: to maximize a company's market value within a reasonable amount of time and find the ideal opportunity to turn otherwise-illiquid shares into cash accordingly.

Time-based or milestone vesting.

Vesting is what prevents a co-founder from walking away after 6 months with a sizable chunk of a company's shares. Prevent that with time-based vesting, in which stock rights ‘vest' or are accrued with the passage of time, usually in annual chunks. Or, opt for milestone vesting, in which shares vest following certain milestones.

Note that milestone vesting isn't ideal, as a major pivot can mean changed priorities and a number of employees motivated by goals that are no longer relevant. It's worth looking into for consultants, however.

A (well-designed) incremental cash-out program.

Giving founders the opportunity to sell off their shares incrementally over time, rather than forcing them to wait until a liquidity event, can work out if implemented properly. It allows a startup to attract additional investment by freeing up more capital and giving the founders an extra pick-me-up for their continued efforts.

In almost all cases, a program like this should be performance-based, to avoid rewarding founders for poor work. Just make sure the performance metrics are consistent and closely tied to the company's success.

Founder salaries at or below “fair market value”.

An executive member of a startup should be paid just enough to ensure they are productive at work, but not getting complacent by the size of their bank account. Basically, give founders as much as they need, but not as much as they really want. Remember that freeing up funds also means more funds to pay more employees, as well as more runway to get a company to market.

The Bad

A venture capitalist or angel investors won't invest money that will solely go toward paying the founder ceo salary.

Cashing out via a secondary offering.

Allowing founders to get their big payouts before anyone else is a pretty terrible idea. No founder is as productive after getting their full compensation as they are before; they simply have no financial incentive to be. That means they won't go to bat for their employees and investors nearly as hard when it's time for an exit. Just think of it this way: would a founder accept cashing out in a secondary offering if they expected to maximize the company's value in the future liquidity event?

In addition, a secondary offering brings with it burdensome compliance demands and just dirties up a company's cap table with what looks to be a random funding round, one with no precedent for what class of shares these new buyers should be entitled to.

A poorly-designed incremental cash-out program.

When founders have the option of selling off their shares incrementally, they must make a choice between short-term returns now, and theoretically much higher returns in the long term if they win it big. Allowing founders to sell off too many of their shares in such a program just skews the incentives for them to fluff up big numbers early on, and not make the effort to get commensurate returns for their investors.

Likewise, making such a program performance-based but rewarding the wrong kind of performance just encourages founders to focus on the wrong areas of their business, areas that ultimately won't generate value for anyone else.

Paying the founders too much.

A good rule-of-thumb for founder salaries is $50,000 — $75,000. Somewhat higher salaries are acceptable in some cases, depending on the stage of the company and what its runway looks like. Anything six figures is really not acceptable. How can you encourage your employees to accept smaller salaries in exchange for equity — something you really want your employees doing for the sake of your runway — if you don't set that example yourself?

Deferred founder salaries.

This really is not advisable, for the same reasons as above. Don't take a low salary with the expectation of “making up the difference” when you get funding. That should be primarily going toward the company, not your bank account.

Equity vesting without a cliff.

Assuming founders are vesting their shares, it would be very, very unwise to do so without a “cliff,” in which there is no vesting until perhaps one year out. The earliest days of a startup are often the most critical, and they're typically the first major test of the founding team's ability to work together. Every additional co-founder that drops out during this especially turbulent period makes the cap sheet more bloated and complex. So, just hold off on vesting for a while.

This is almost dangerous enough to move into the third category below, except that a very close founding team with prior startup experience may not really need it. Alternatively, if a company has been in the works for a long time prior to incorporation, there is probably no sense in implementing a cliff.

The Suicidal

Generating revenue after receiving venture capital is the only way toward landing an annual salary

Basing founder stock or salary compensation on initial cash put-in.

It may seem fair at the genesis of a startup to give the other guy, who put $30k into the business, an additional 20% ownership. It certainly won't seem that way when your company is worth 8 figures and your co-founder's $30k buy-in got them millions more in the long run. Founder disagreements and disharmony are one of the most common causes of startup failure, and disharmony over an unfair equity distribution is one way to go down that path.

Instead, assign equity compensation based on the relative value and volume of the work provided by each founder. A co-founder whose most significant contribution is startup capital should probably be an investor, not a team member. If a co-founder does want to contribute, just pay them back when you close your first funding round. Hell, add interest if you want, but leave it at that.

Giving founders too much equity, and employees too little.

Do you want unmotivated employees with no financial stake in their work besides whatever paltry salary you can afford to pay them with your limited runway? Is your goal to minimize productivity and maximize turnover? Because paying your employees a poor wage or giving them minimal equity is a great way to achieve exactly that.

Founders probably don't have enough runway to pay the kind of salary their employees could earn working at Google, so they should be very generous with their option pools. Employees must be passionate about their mission, but they should have a nice payout to look forward to all the same.

Paying the founders too little, or not at all.

As vital as it may be for startup employees to be compensated with enough equity and cash to be productive, it is just as crucial — if not more so — that founders earn a meaningful wage with a proper founder salary. That extra bit of runway from foregoing a salary is more than compensated by the loss of productivity or burnout that comes with worrying about rent or living off ramen for a year.

Besides, if you're starting a company, then it's safe to assume you bring to the table some talents that would make you hireable elsewhere. That means you have an opportunity cost, and it's only fair that you get a halfway-decent wage to reflect that.

Startup founder salary

What about a Startup Founder Salary?

As we've just gone over, founder compensation is a tricky issue in startups. The founder is usually one of the first employees and often winds up doing the work of two or three people. If you're lucky, you'll have a team that can help share the load, but even then it's hard to divide up the work and make sure everyone is pulling their weight.

Founders who aren't paid well are going to be unhappy and less motivated. They may also leave right when you need them most – during your next round of financing or when you're trying to scale the business.

Founder compensation should be fair from day one before there's any equity involved. It's not just about paying yourself enough money so that you can afford to live on what other people are making, it's about setting an example for everyone else on how much effort everyone should put into their jobs, whether they're full-time employees or contractors.

Summary

The most successful startups have investors, employees, and founders that are on the same page about getting the company to a massive, wildly lucrative exit in the long term. A good compensation program can focus all minds and efforts involved in a startup towards that goal, helping to ensure the path to success is as free of friction and misalignment as it possibly could be.

Of course, there are exceptions — a founder with several wildly successful exits on their belt probably has enough savings to justify a $1 salary — but the above guidelines should help steer you away from any serious faux pas.

The good news? Putting together a robust, fair founder compensation plan from the very beginning means never having to worry about it again, freeing up more of your mental energy… and at a startup, you can never have too much of that.

Ryan Dwyer

Helps me consider a few things...I think about this alot, since I am concept stage.

Reply2 years ago

shahriar naghshineh

In order to attract additional founders, keep them focused and committed, pay them going industry rate. If paying less, then compensate with bonuses based on growth and profitability. stock options (equity position) using non-voting stocks is a motivator too. But must have buyout agreements in place to ensure compliance and avoid conflicts.

Joseph Ayuk EGBENCHONG II

This is an interesting take on the topic of founder compensation. I have always disregarded founder stock based on cash-only without proper value and volume given in return to make the company grow.

For a fair stock option pool, I think allocating 100 000 shares per round is a good start for employees interested in stocks.

this is

How would you advise for a position at a startup that hasn't gotten any funding yet and so can't pay a salary for their first developer? Is accepting founder stock rather than options worth considering and what percentage would be fair? What other options are available when there is no funding yet?

Upgrade to join the discussion.

Already a member? Login

Upgrade to Unlock